Trending Topics

Our Initiatives BioPolicy Summit 2018 Who We Are
See the Latest BioPolicy Summit
Learn More About Our Education Programs
GBSI_
  • What’s New
    • Press
      • Never Break the Chain
      • The Great Reproducibility Problem
      • All Press
    • Publications
      • Matched Preclinical Designs For Improved Translatability
      • Reproducibility 2020: Progress and Priorities
      • All Publications
    • News
  • Training
  • Events
  • About Us
    • Who We Are
      • Our Mission
      • Our History
      • Scientific Advisory Board
      • Partners
    • What We Do
      • Initiatives
        • Case For Standards
        • Reproducibility2020
        • Cell Line Authentication
        • Antibody Validation Initiative
        • BioSpecimen Commons
        • Laboratory Automation & Digital Tools
      • Events
      • Training
Log In

Proficiency Index Assessment (PIA)

Background on the PIA

Every year $28B is spent on preclinical research that cannot be reproduced, a challenge that increases the cost and time to translate research into life-saving therapies. Despite increasing pressure within the academic community to address the challenges of irreproducibility, little has been done to provide researchers with the tools and resources they need to adequately address this issue.

To better understand the needs for training of researchers, GBSI developed a baseline assessment of the current state of knowledge and skill level across the fundamental components of research fidelity, an effort known as the Good Research Practices Survey.

 

 

PIA Participants
Participants By Years of Experience (n=1,010)

The PIA Survey

The survey was to provide high level insights into the general level of preparedness, and identify specific areas of opportunity for additional training and development.

To the end, GBSI developed a 25 question survey covering five core subjects deemed critical to research fidelity: Study Design, Preparation & Staging, Data Management & Analysis, and Experiment Execution and Reporting Results.  The survey was distributed to PIs and researchers across the country, with high levels of engagement.  In total, more than 1,000 individuals participated in the survey, across a wide range of academic backgrounds and experience levels.

 

 

 

 

 

Score By Experience
Score By Education
Score By Subject

 

 

 

 

 

 

Highlights of the Results

The survey highlighted a number of key insights into the current state and training needs of the preclinical research arena, specifically around three areas: Prioritization of Training Needs, Impact of Experience, and Impact of Educational Background.

  1. Prioritization of Training Needs
    The results indicate the need to prioritize training in the more ‘Foundational’ research topics (Study Design, Reporting Results and Data Management & Analysis), with participants scoring higher on the more ‘Executional’ subjects (Experimental Execution and Preparation & Staging)
  2. Where Experience Matters
    While experience correlated with higher performance across the board, the impact that experience played in the “Executional” topics points to an opportunity for increased training from within the current environment (ie the experienced PI), while the comparatively smaller performance differential found in “Foundational” subjects highlights the importance of ongoing education and external support within those topics.

 

Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
  • Contact
  • Publications
  • Press
  • Careers

Funded by ATCC and The BioNexus Foundation

Terms & Conditions   Privacy  © Global Biological Standards Institute 2019. Site by Barrel